How we rate
We write for UK and EU parents. Our language follows the spirit of the ICO Children’s Code (age-appropriate design) and GDPR — high privacy by default, clear parental involvement, no pretending a filter equals “safe”.
The four verdicts
What we check
- Age rules — what the operator states; regional differences (especially UK/EEA).
- Parent controls — account ownership, chat visibility, limits, quiet hours, alerts.
- Privacy / data — where data lives, ads/tracking, training use, children’s rights.
- Product intent — homework helper vs open companion character chat.
What we never do
- Sell safety scores or paid “featured safe” badges.
- Invent certifications, lab results, or user counts.
- Fill gaps with guesses — unknowns stay unknown, and we lean caution.
- Recommend sharing adult logins with children.
COPPA vs UK Children’s Code
Many kids apps lead with US COPPA. That matters if you are in the US. For UK/EU families we care more about lawful basis, data minimisation, parental involvement, and whether the design is age-appropriate. We mention COPPA only when the operator’s own documents make it relevant.
Review cadence
Each app page shows a last reviewed date. Policies change. Re-check official links before you rely on an older verdict, and tell us if something looks out of date via Submit an app.